Email Marketing
What makes a good subject line?
Subject lines are an important part of your email, so here's how to not mess them up.
Read More →
Has the iOS 15 update resurfaced old perceptions about email tracking being unethical? And are these true? We explore this.
You may have seen a lot of news around iOS 15's Mail Privacy Protection lately. In fact, if you work in email marketing you're probably quite concerned about this. As we scramble for answers to the challenges this will present, questions around the ethics of tracking in email marketing are also inevitably going to resurface.
It's not the first time email marketing has been in the news for this sort of thing, but is it fair? Should we be worried about the perception email marketing may gain as a result of these stories and updates? We say no. We'd like to switch up the narrative here - and explain just what happens with tracking in email marketing, why it's good (and ethical!) for all parties, and why it's not the massive privacy invasion some may lead you to believe.
The new iOS update essentially offers its users the option to load content remotely and not disclose their IP address. For marketers this means they won't be able to track forwards, opens and subscriber locations if subscribers are using Apple Mail. And this is a lot of people - according to SparkPost, Apple Mail and Apple iPhone account for 40% of the overall email client market share in 2021. You can find out more about what exactly this means for email marketers in SparkPost's insightful and ever-updating blog post on the impact of the iOS 15 update on open tracking for email marketers.
The fact that tracking open rates and subscriber locations has been targeted by Apple has put email marketing under the spotlight of customer data privacy. But we've been here before.
Back in February 2021, you may have seen this article from the BBC. In conjunction with new email client and big-player-disruptor HEY, it claimed that spy pixels were in two-thirds of all emails, that they were 'endemic' and that (quoting from the HEY co-founder) they were a 'grotesque invasion of privacy'. Strong words and sentiments towards the email industry. It put email's tracking techniques squarely in the same bracket as any bad data usage or snooping scandals that other tech companies have been caught up in. The article went viral and into newspapers like the Sun and other global publications.
In truth, the article boils down to little more than sponsored content. And the DMA discovered that the BBC - who wrote the article - also use tracking pixels in their emails. But regardless of any sensationalism, it did start some debates around the ethical nature of email tracking and the privacy connected to it. And these continue to rumble on with the new iOS update.
No one likes spam emails, but email pixels and subsequent tracking by email marketers is NOT used for the purposes of creating spam emails or unwanted inbox intrusion.
To explain what these pixels are and what they do, let's turn to one of the top #emailgeeks (and Taxi evangelist) Elliot Ross (click the Twitter link below to see his thread!):